hi, nice day
http://balazojrracing.com/folderoldpublik1291.php?jzyreed=6
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:10:47__________________
"But while they were at this Mr." (c) Chyane wjda8a9
hi, nice day
http://balazojrracing.com/folderoldpublik1291.php?jzyreed=6
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:10:47Posted on January 05, 2012 at 08:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
hi, nice day
http://balazojrracing.com/folderoldpublik1291.php?jzyreed=6
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:10:47Posted on January 05, 2012 at 08:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Sir Richard: I'm not inclined to complain about Virgin America, since I've just had such a jolly time flying in your airplanes. I really like the attitude and style you've brought to discount flying. I love the purple mood lights. I like the crew's attitude. I love the wifi on every airplane and the power plugs (which I only just discovered on this flight). I even like the dorky on-screen ordering system for food and snacks, a major improvement over pushing the flight-attendant call button to which flight attendants on other airlines don't seem to respond. But...
I seem to have gotten on the closest thing to a flight from hell, VX 23 from JFK to SFO. The first two hours were spent in pretty rocky turbulence, the kind where the crew has to stay buckled in. (The pilot warned us before we took off, so I didn't think too much about the Air France flight that fell into the Atlantic.) And then, as soon as the seat belt light went off, half the plane sprinted for the bathrooms. Being in the window seat, I wait for the rush to get over, by which time the service cart was blocking the aisle to the lower class bathrooms. and the very same, snippy flight attendant (see below) told me to wait for 10 minutes. I had to go, so I broke the code and went into Upper Class. Phew...
I have one really important suggestion: Perhaps you could train your flight attendants to have a different response than, “We’re not trained to do technical support for GoGoLink WiFi”. The WiFi on our flight didn't work for the first three hours. Your flight attendant suggested that I call GoGo directly. So I observed that I pay for Virgin America to fly the airplane and that I generally don't try to figure out what's wrong with the airplane. Since you had personally promoted the WiFi service on the video screen before the flight took off, I thought that perhaps there was another way to fix the WiFi service than asking customers to do it. I showed her the computer screen that said “Service Unavailable: Sorry, the Gogo Inflight Internet service is currently down. Please try again later.” I said that I didn’t think I would be able to diagnose the technical problem either, since the server was unavailable, and that she could help inform the other passengers that there is a problem and that it was being worked on. (She did that about an hour later, after someone official communicated to the airplane, presumably, that the service wasn't working. It's always nice to be treated in a trusting manner, eh?)
To be honest, Sir Richard, I don’t think I should have to tell your flight attendant these things. I think maybe you could provide training to your flight attendants for a better way to respond to customers having a problem with WiFi. And, in this particular case, I need to observe that this particular flight attendant did not seem to have the Virgin America spirit that I’ve observed so consistently on my last six flights with the airline. She seemed perturbed that I would actually tell her that there is a problem and seek her understanding and guidance. Indeed, she seemed rather snippy, as I believe that you British people like to say.
Anyway, the WiFi service has now come on, and I am posting this from 38,046 miles above Utah. I love watching my plane make its way across the country on the screen in front of me. In fact, I even posted this photo to my Facebook profile from the flight to JFK last Wednesday: I loved the idea of watching the plane land from inside the plane that was actually landing!
Posted on June 06, 2009 at 12:18 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Answer: When you can't get them to honor cash.
I finally had a customer service experience this morning worth blogging about, to break my long dry spell. I figure that, in the current economy, companies are being extra nice so it's harder to find really dumb customer service. (Indeed, I've noticed that I'm getting actual email from companies that used to be too good to send email, like the Four Seasons and Ritz Carlton hotel chains.) I even had the experience of taking four different flights on two different airlines on Sunday and every single flight left exactly on time and three of them arrived early! Even the airlines are making my night job rough. But I'm still on the job, looking for egregious service situations to report to you, my dear, loyal readers!
And I am thrilled to report that it is my old nemesis Wells Fargo that continues to meet my expectations. I have to get a new passport to replace the one that was stolen, and I need it in a hurry because I'm headed to New Zealand in 10 days. So I went to the SF City Hall passport office because it opens at 8am (the USPS offices open at 9:30am). They forgot to mention on the phone yesterday that the feds don't take cash, so I had to go buy a money order with all the cash I'd just gotten out of Wells Fargo's ATM. I went back to the Wells Fargo branch, figuring what better place to use cash to buy a money order than a bank! The sign says that the line is for Wells Fargo "Members" but I thought they were just being cute.
But, no, the lady behind the bullet proof glass (it is City Hall Plaza, where the homeless like to hang out) required that I produce the Wells Fargo debit card to verify my account number. I observed that I was a buying a money order (a negotiable security) with cash (also a negotiable security) and that a bank was a depository of cash. (Well, I didn't sound that sophisticated; it came out more like, "But you're a bank!") I walked out muttering about how Wells Fargo has forgotten how to be a bank and that there was a good reason that I took all of my money out of that institution four years ago. (And remembering that Wells Fargo screwed one of my companies by buying auction rate securities in a cash account without asking for permission.)
I turned left, found a Fedex office two doors down, bought the money order for cash (no ID needed) without even talking to the gentleman behind the counter (who looked like he might not have total command of the English language anyway), all in less than 120 seconds. The passport office accepted the money order and promised to get my new passport ready for pick up next Wednesday!
In which part of its corporate body has Wells Fargo stuck its head, when it can't even match city employees for quality of customer service?
Posted on February 12, 2009 at 10:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
You'll have to be dedicated to reading rants about United Airlines to get through this one, but I couldn't resist documenting this online for posterity! I had a reservation on UA 844, departing SFO for LAX at 2:59pm on Monday, October 27. What happened that afternoon was a classic!
At 12:11pm, before I left the office (I parked my car at the airport), I received a re-assuring confirmation that the flight was due to leave on time.
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:11 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES DEPARTURE REMINDER MESSAGE **
The following flight is scheduled for departure:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 844
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
Gate: 73 (Gate is subject to change)
Estimated Departure Time: 2:59 p.m.on time
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight times are subject to change. Please check the flight information monitors at the airport.
Being a diligent traveler, I left the office around 12:40pm. As I was pulling away I got the following flight cancellation notice. I also got an automated phone call, to United's credit.
Monday, October 27, 2008 12:51 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT CANCELLATION MESSAGE **
The following flight has been cancelled:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 844
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We may have already booked you on an alternate flight. Please contact a United Customer Service Representative or call United Reservations at 1-800-241-6522.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
As a result of the phone notification, I called United from my car and managed to rebook myself on the next flight, UA 119. Shortly after that, while still driving toward the airport, I got another (presumably re-assuring) notification that this flight was on time.
Monday, October 27, 2008 1:13 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES DEPARTURE REMINDER MESSAGE **
The following flight is scheduled for departure:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 119
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
Gate: 74 (Gate is subject to change)
Estimated Departure Time: 3:58 p.m.on time
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight times are subject to change. Please check the flight information monitors at the airport.
Shortly after I parked my car and got into the airport, I received the following rebooking message, which startled me. I calmed down when I realized that United had rebooked me automatically from the cancelled flight. I was only amused (instead of enraged) that they had rebooked me on a flight for the following day, just to get to Los Angeles, to which they must have at least 14 or more flights a day.
Monday, October 27, 2008 1:22 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT REBOOKING MESSAGE **
Dear ALSOP / STEWART MR II,
We regret to inform you that a delay has affected the following flight(s):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 844
Operated By: United Airlines
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles (LAX)
Date: October 27
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have made additional arrangements for you on the best available, alternate flight. Your new itinerary is:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 1153
Operated By: United Airlines
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Departing: 6:11 a.m.
Traveling To: Los Angeles (LAX)
Arriving: 7:37 a.m.
Date: October 28
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When I checked in to get my boarding pass, the gate agent offered to put me on a 12:50pm flight that had not yet left and was then scheduled for a 2:30pm departure. I would have had to scramble through security to make that flight (in less than 30 minutes), but I had scheduled a meeting with one of my CEOs at the airport so I kept my rebooked reservation on the 3:58pm departure. Then, after my meeting and getting through security on a reasonably leisurely basis, I get the following notification that my rebooked flight is going to be delayed by at least 90 minutes (from 3:58pm to 5:21pm).
Monday, October 27, 2008 2:30 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT UPDATE MESSAGE **
The following flight time has been revised:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 119
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
Gate: 70 (Gate is subject to change)
Estimated Departure Time: 5:21 p.m.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight times are subject to change. Please check the flight information monitors at the airport.
Resigned to living with what appeared to be chaos in United's flights going to LAX, I wandered by the gate for that 12:50pm flight the gate agent had offered that was supposed to leave at 2:30pm. And it was still there at 2:30pm with a new departure time of 2:57pm. So I stood in line to see if I could get a seat on that flight (the number of which I can no longer remember) -- and I did. The irony that struck me as I settled into my exit-row seat with lots of leg room and no one in the seat next to me is that my original flight, the cancelled one, was scheduled to leave at 2:58pm, one minute later than the airplane I actually got on and took to LAX. So I arrived at LAX earlier than I was originally scheduled.
But the fun continued! I then got a notification while I was enroute to Los Angeles of a flight delay for a rebooked flight that I was never scheduled to be on at all (to my knowledge, at least)! And, if you read the notice carefully (compared to the first six), you'll notice that it has no departure time or gate. Perhaps it is the phantom flight in United's alerting system, kind of a ghost flight.
Monday, October 27, 2008 3:33 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT REBOOKING MESSAGE **
Dear ALSOP / STEWART MR II,
We regret to inform you that a delay has affected the following flight(s):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 886
Operated By: United Airlines
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles (LAX)
Date: October 27
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But that wasn't enough! I also got a notification, time stamped at exactly the same time as the ghost notification, that the flight I was actually rebooked on but had abandoned in favor of the one of I was on when I got the notification (are you following this?) had been delayed another 21 minutes. When I landed at LAX and got this notification, I could only thank my lucky stars that I had hopped on the earlier late flight!
Monday, October 27, 2008 3:33 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT UPDATE MESSAGE **
The following flight time has been revised:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 119
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
Gate: 70 (Gate is subject to change)
Estimated Departure Time: 5:42 p.m.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight times are subject to change. Please check the flight information monitors at the airport.
Then, to cap it off, after I had checked into my hotel and plugged my computer in before going to dinner (on time!), I got one last notification that the 3:58pm flight had been delayed again to depart at 6:03pm. I made it to dinner before that flight left the gate at SFO.
Monday, October 27, 2008 5:34 PM
** UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT UPDATE MESSAGE **
The following flight time has been revised:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight Number: 119
Departing From: San Francisco California (SFO)
Traveling To: Los Angeles International (LAX)
Date: October 27
Gate: 70 (Gate is subject to change)
Estimated Departure Time: 6:03 p.m.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Flight times are subject to change. Please check the flight information monitors at the airport.
As you can see, this was too delicious to leave undocumented. A total of nine travel alerts from United Airlines in the space of a little more than five hours and the only one that actually alerted me to something I didn't know was the original cancellation notice. I could come up with some kind of moral about alerting systems and computer intelligence or the power of programming, but I'll leave that up to smarter people. I just feel better for having shared!
Posted on October 30, 2008 at 08:37 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Okay, the service tech showed up only an hour after the four hour window for my appointment ended. But he installed my voice service and briefed me on what to expect and was both friendly and competent. And now I have Comcast Voice, the third piece of the Triple Play. And, guess what: I'm wondering why I left Vonage!
It took me 20 minutes just to establish what my Secret and my Security questions are. Yes, you need one of each for some reason, even though they come from the same list of nonsensical questions. Can you remember which is your favorite movie, so that you can get into your account a year later after you forget your password? And when they ask for my honeymoon destination, do they mean from my first or second marriage? (Who the heck came up with these questions!? What was wrong with my mother's maiden name?)
I finally get all that squared away (after very carefully writing down all my passwords and secret and security questions so I can be sure to remember what they are, which is of course the very reason you don't want to make passwords too difficult to remember because we're human beings and can't remember them!). And then I leave myself a voice message, so I can hear what it sounds like. But I can't hear the message because the system is unavailable. So then I go to voice mail setup, which requires a different password with a different security and secret question pair than my login to Comcast.net. And once I figure out how to set that up and get into voice mail, it turns out the little application for listening to voice mails through my web browser doesn't work.
So why was it that I left Vonage? Did people say that it was unreliable or that the company was in trouble because of bigger and better funded competitors, like Comcast? Huh?
Posted on October 04, 2008 at 03:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I sit here in my house waiting for Comcast. The last time they were supposed to come, they didn't. That was the day after I moved in, when I wanted to make sure I had internet service and television service. Fortunately, I had my technical resource with me and he figured out how to make the service work. (Funny how Comcast really doesn't need to do a "truck roll" to make things work. Call or write if you want a referral to my ultra geek and you live in the SF Bay Area.)
In fact, now that I think about it, Comcast has not been to this house since I moved in. I hope the rep doesn't have trouble finding it!
So call me crazy: I signed up for Triple Play AFTER that experience. That means I switched my phone service from Vonage to Comcast so that I would have everything that really matters to me coming through one relatively unreliable vendor! That was a month ago. That's how long it takes to get an appointment with a Comcast technician (and how long in advance I had scheduled the appointment for the technician who never showed up).
I called this morning to confirm the appointment, since I hadn't heard a single thing from Comcast in the past month. No confirmation that my phone service has been switched; no appointment reminder; nothing. "Push 1 to hear the timing of your appointment this morning", so I pushed 1. The fellow who answered (pretty quickly), asked what I wanted and I said that I had pushed 1 to hear the time of my scheduled appointment. He confirmed that I did have an appointment this morning. I asked when; he said between 8am and noon. I observed that it was already 8:30am and asked if it was possible to get a more precise idea of when my service rep would appear. He said, "No, that's not possible. If he doesn't show up by noon, just call back and we'll get his supervisor to track him down and find out where he is."
That's really comforting. Am I really believing at this point that the Comcast technician will actually show up?
Posted on October 04, 2008 at 09:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
The customer service part of this story is bad enough, but my experience with Western Union actually scared me -- and that's not easy to do.
I wanted to send $60 as a booking fee to an individual in Buenos Aires, where we are headed in a few weeks. She asked me to use the Money In Minutes feature on www.westerunion.com. Seemed innocuous, so I plunged in.
You have to identify from what state and to what country you are sending money. Fill in personal information, including date of birth, choose a particularly strong password, choose a security question and match the captcha. (I had to come up with yet-another new password because Western Union has a different requirement than every other vendor: "Passwords must be 7 to 16 characters long and include at least one capital letter, one lower case letter, and one number.") I filled out the form, provided my debit card information (only Visa and Master Charge; does American Express know something we don't about Western Union?) and was told to call a toll-free number to complete the transaction.
Remember that all I want to do is send $60. So far, Western Union had already exceeded everything that an average e-commerce vendor requires (credit card + security numbers) or that a bank requires (strong password and a security question).
Once I got an agent, she began what I can only call an interrogation process.
*She confirmed the information I had already entered manually (leading one to wonder what the point of doing an online form was).
*She asked me the last four digits of my Social Security number. I hadn't provided that number online so she must have looked it up. Is that legal? If so, who is providing my SS# online so freely?
*She asked the security question which I had provided online.
*Then she told me that she needed to ask me four additional questions, which she was clearly asking as the questions were composed on her computer in real time. The first question was "If you had a car loan in 2003, please identify the provider of that loan from the following list of four companies" and then proceeded to name four companies and gave me the option of saying "None of the above" as the fifth choice.
I didn't recognize any of the four companies and don't remember having a car loan in 2003. (It's my normal practice to either buy cars or lease them, not to borrow money to buy them. I might have been the cosigner on someone else's car, but I don't remember.) So I told the lady that I could not honestly answer the question she was asking, that I did not know the answer to the question. And I asked her what I should do. She told me was not allowed to give me guidance and only allowed the ask the question and record my answer and could not move on to the next question unless I answered the first one.
I then entered an Orwellian nightmare, where it was not possible to move forward or backward and my only option, if I wanted to remain an honest and upstanding citizen would have been to cancel the transaction -- after 15 minutes of trying to move "Money In Minutes". She eventually transferred me to a "supervisor", but he said exactly the same words as the first lady. (Think they might have been working off a script?) So I answered "None of the above/Does not apply". I had to answer the next question the same way, because it was about a mortgage in 2003 (we switched mortgages on my last house three times and I didn't recognize which of the vendors they listed as the correct one). I answered the last two questions, whereupon the "supervisor" told me that they could not complete the transaction. I hung up in disgust and was late to my next appointment.
This is bad enough as a customer service experience. How the heck does Western Union do any business if they treat their customers with this level of hostility and rigidity? But I keep wondering: How much does this company know about me now? How do they know in real time that I had car loans and mortgages five years ago and know enough to try to trap me into giving them the wrong answer? (I looked up their privacy policy after this experience and, guess what: "We may disclose Information about current and former consumers and customers to the following types of third parties:" everybody including financial service companies, retailers, and governments. So now, even though we did not do business, Western Union has the right to share the information it did get from me with other vendors at its will.)
My conclusion: Don't ever do business with Western Union. This company has the worst privacy and consumer service policies I have ever encountered. It needs to be put out of business. And I am fearful that a company that is this incompetent knows anything about me and has any right whatsoever to do anything with that information, much less do whatever it wants to do.
Posted on October 04, 2008 at 09:13 AM | Permalink | Comments (3)
Posted on July 17, 2008 at 09:54 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Posted on July 05, 2008 at 07:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)